Rolls Royce shares fall 18% as defence cuts hit profits
Rolls-Royce's Trent 1000 engine powers Boeing's 787 Dreamliner Shares in Rolls Royce fell 18% after the the aerospace and marine manufacturer warned profits at its defence aerospace division would fall 15-20%.
Cuts in European and US defence spending are to blame for the expected fall in revenues.
Rolls said growth for the whole group will "pause" in 2014 after 11 years of unbroken profit growth.
Most analysts had pencilled in 8% growth in 2014 profits.
Continue reading the main storyRolls-Royce Holdings
Last Updated at 13 Feb 2014, 16:30 *Chart shows local time| price | change | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1045.00 p | - -165.00 | - -13.64 |
Rolls Royce saw almost £4bn wiped off its value on the stock exchange.
Shares in its European rivals BAE Systems, Finmeccanica and Airbus fell by between 2% and 3%.
Chief Executive John Rishton said: "We've defied gravity for a couple of years compared to many other companies and now we're having the impact come together in one year,"
Mr Rishton said: "This is a pause, not a change in direction, and growth will resume in 2015.
"Cash flow is expected to be broadly similar to 2013. Our record order book underpins our confidence in the long-term growth of our business."
Part of the problem was that profits had been unsustainably inflated by big export orders over the last two years - the Eurojet EJ200 engine to the Middle East and the Adour engine to India.
Mr Rishton said the group also faced possible cuts by the US on the size of its Lockheed Martin-built C-130 transport fleet.
There is continuing uncertainty over how much US and European governments will cut their defence spending as their budgets are squeezed.
However demand for fuel-efficient engines for planes made by Europe's Airbus and U.S. Boeing is soaring and produced a 23% rise in underlying pretax profits for Rolls-Royce's civil aerospace unit. The group expects a "modest" increase in profits in 2013 in its Marine and Civil Aviation divisions.
The group has restructured by cutting 11% of its "indirect headcount" in 2013, and has been moving production away from high-cost countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment