Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Hunt to scrap Stafford health trust

Stafford Hospital: Health Secretary Hunt agrees to dissolve trust

Stafford Hospital in February 2013 A public inquiry was triggered at Stafford Hospital after a higher than expected number of deaths at the trust

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has backed calls to dissolve the trust that runs the scandal-hit Stafford Hospital.

Mr Hunt said Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust would be scrapped and, while its two hospitals will remain open, many services will move to other hospitals.

The trust has been in administration since April when services were deemed "unsustainable" by watchdog Monitor.

However, campaigners who oppose the move have pledged to challenge the decision in the courts.

Under the plans, Stafford and Cannock Chase Hospitals will be "operated by other local providers".

Mr Hunt said the changes would "secure the safe and high-quality services that the people of Stafford deserve having endured years of uncertainty and failures in care".

He added: "I want Stafford to be a proper district hospital that continues to meet the needs of patients nearby, including for emergency care and births."

He said he wanted to dissolve the trust "as soon as possible" to stabilise local health services.

'A toxic name'

Stafford could still retain consultant-led maternity services after Mr Hunt agreed to NHS England carrying out a review into the issue.

The original plan from administrators had been for maternity services to close but this was later amended to allow for the creation of a midwife-led unit.

Mr Hunt has now agreed to review that decision to see whether consultant-led services - needed for more difficult births - should be retained.

The trust was criticised in February 2013 in a public inquiry headed by Robert Francis QC for causing the "suffering of hundreds of people" under its care between 2005 and 2008.

The inquiry criticised the cost-cutting and target-chasing culture that had developed at the trust.

Receptionists were left to decide which patients to treat, inexperienced doctors were put in charge of critically ill patients and nurses were not trained how to use vital equipment.

Cases have also been documented of patients left crying out for help because they did not get pain relief and food and drinks being left out of reach.

Data shows there were between 400 and 1,200 more deaths than would have been expected between 2005 and 2008, although it is impossible to say all of these patients would have survived if they had received better treatment.

The inquiry made 290 recommendations aimed at tackling the wider cultural problems in the NHS.

Support Stafford Hospital campaigners There is a vocal local campaign group in support of Stafford Hospital

Sue Hawkins, from the Save Stafford Hospital group, said: "We were expecting the trust to dissolve.

"We understood from the outset that would be the case but we are a semi-rural area and people are going to have to travel long distances to receive care.

"It's been a very lengthy process. I wouldn't wish this on any other hospital."

Cheryl Porter, another campaigner, said the decision to move services was "unacceptable for a community of this size". She argued hospitals in Stoke-on-Trent, Wolverhampton and Walsall were "not ready" to take the extra patients.

David Cameron backed the retention of consultant-led maternity services at the hospital

Gail Gregory, from Stafford, whose husband is being treated at the hospital, said she had expected the decision because the trust had a "toxic name".

She said: "The hospital has been made a guinea pig for new government policies." She blamed the poor care on "the rush to Trust status".

She added: "Fifty thousand local people know the value of their hospital and this fight is not over."

Philip Atkins, leader of Staffordshire County Council, said: "While this will undoubtedly be a bitter blow for campaigners, it is also an opportunity to show how the county can now lead the way in demonstrating how integrated hospital and community care can be both delivered safely and meet the highest standards."

Christina McAnea, head of health for Unison, said the decision was "bitterly disappointing" for the local community and staff.

"The facts show patient care has improved massively," she said.

"If key services are to be transferred to neighbouring trusts, it is vital that they are given the financial resources needed to take on the extra responsibility."

How will the decision to dissolve the trust affect you? Send your comments using the form below.


No comments:

Post a Comment